0% Top
two evidence lines / 180 scored records

Ropedia Xperience-10M Task Suite.

This project builds on the Xperience-10M egocentric dataset released by Ropedia and turns it into public, reproducible embodied-AI evaluation materials. It defines 20 task contracts, provides a fully inspectable sample-episode line, and adds a selected-128 comparison line for baselines, Qwen3-Omni v6 LoRA, Cosmos3-Super Reasoner, and Cosmos3-Nano Future Window. Across 180 scored method-task records, direct scores stay separate from six clearly marked compact-proxy estimates, so public-safe feature results are not confused with direct raw-target measurements.

line 1 / public sample

1 sample episode: task lab

One public episode becomes aligned windows, task targets, Minimal heads, and Neural MLP heads.

best use

Inspect the sample files, task targets, and local baseline runs.

read separately from

Selected-128 comparison rows and held-out model behavior.

5,821frames 1,16120-frame windows 40/40direct task scores
Open sample line
line 2 / 128 selected episodes

128 selected episodes: comparison surface

Seven methods share the selected-episode surface and the same 20 task axes.

best use

Compare same-split baselines, Qwen3-Omni v6, and Cosmos3 rows.

read separately from

The 6 compact-proxy cells, which use public-safe compact features instead of direct raw-target reads.

128selected episodes 34,269exported windows 140/140134 direct + 6 proxy
Open 128-episode line
5,821frames in sample episode
1,16120-frame windows
8,546feature dimensions
20unified task contracts
project overview scope / tasks / result records

Scope, tasks, and evidence stay separated.

The project separates dataset scope, task contracts, result records, and source files so each score can be traced to its evidence line.

180method-task records
174direct scores
6compact-proxy scores
34,269128ep windows
open radar The full grouped radar is useful for pattern scanning after comparing the 1-episode and 128-episode views. Unified 20-task grouped radar board with method-family panels, task key, score counts, and raw128 proxy notes
task names and sources All 20 task axes, radar images, result matrix, and proxy audit remain available here without crowding the first screen.
All 20 radar task axes 01 Action Recognition 02 Procedure Step Recognition 03 Action Boundary Detection 04 Next-Action Prediction 05 Hand Trajectory Forecasting 06 Contact State Prediction 07 Object Relevance Prediction 08 Language Grounding 09 Cross-Modal Retrieval 10 Cross-Modal Reconstruction 11 Temporal Order Verification 12 Multimodal Synchronization Detection 13 Long-Horizon Next-Action Forecasting 14 Long-Horizon Next-Subtask Forecasting 15 Interaction Text Prediction 16 Action-Object Relation Prediction 17 Future Object-Set Forecasting 18 IMU-to-Hand Pose Reconstruction 19 Camera-View Synchronization Retrieval 20 Time-to-Next-Transition Regression

Project overview and evidence map.

The project separates the two evidence lines, the 20-task suite, the result table, and the public artifact mirrors before deeper archive-level files.

Ropedia Xperience-10M Task Suite project logo
Project identity Shared package across GitHub, web, and Hugging Face

The mark identifies the Ropedia Xperience-10M Task Suite package across the GitHub repository, GitHub Pages dashboard, Hugging Face Space, artifact dataset, model mirrors, and social preview. Ropedia is credited here as the Xperience-10M data provider and releaser; this site is the task-suite, evaluation, and public-safe artifact layer built on top of that released dataset.

Roadmap

Shipped stages, active work, and scale-up targets after the result table.

Open roadmap
Glossary

Definitions for project terms, metrics, model families, public mirrors, and proxy scores.

Open glossary
Research progress

Current experiments, verified model evidence, public mirrors, and milestone boundaries.

Open progress
Foundation paths

Spatial-intelligence, world-model, and VLA paths placed after current results and scale-up status.

Open foundation paths
Two evidence-line map showing 1 sample episode, 128 selected episodes, and the combined 180 scored method-task records
Line Data unit Score statement Best use Read separately from Start here
1 sample episode One public Xperience-10M sample episode; 5,821 frames; 1,161 aligned 20-frame windows; 8,546-dimensional feature contract. 40/40 direct scores from Minimal and Neural MLP heads. Raw sample inspection, file organization, task definitions, local reproduction, and controlled Minimal-vs-Neural baseline behavior. The selected-128 comparison rows and broader held-out model behavior. Raw browser
1-episode radar data
result summary data
evidence-line data
128 selected episodes Selected held-out 96/16/16 split; 34,269 exported windows; public-safe metadata/raw-feature artifacts linked to official gated episode paths. 140/140 selected-128 scores: 134 direct + 6 compact-proxy. Same-split comparison across metadata/raw baselines, Qwen3-Omni v6 LoRA, Cosmos3-Super, Cosmos3-Nano, and scale-up decisions. Direct raw-target interpretation for the proxy-marked cells. 128-episode radar data
source and feature index
HF selected-128 windows
result summary data
evidence-line note
Evidence line Method block Methods Score statement Read as
1 sample episode Task-head baselines Minimal; Neural MLP 40/40 direct scores. Task-lab reproducibility and simple-vs-neural behavior.
128 selected episodes Aligned baseline heads Metadata simple/NN; raw-feature simple/NN 80/80 scores: 74 direct + 6 compact-proxy. Same-split metadata/raw-feature baseline comparison.
128 selected episodes Qwen3-Omni series Qwen3-Omni v6 LoRA 20/20 direct scores from verified selected-128 Qwen3-Omni LoRA and task-specific probes. Trainable Qwen3-Omni diagnostic baseline on the selected-128 surface.
128 selected episodes Cosmos3 series Cosmos3-Super Reasoner; Cosmos3-Nano Future Window 40/40 direct scores from verified public-safe reasoner and future-window artifacts. Cosmos3 reasoner and future-window diagnostics on the selected-128 surface.

Cosmos3-Super Forward-Dynamics LoRA is published as a separate fine-tuned adapter with weights/results; it is not counted as a 20-task matrix method row.

Qwen run Purpose Main change Eval signal Use now
v1 Prove the selected-128 LoRA/eval/package loop. First verified 96/16/16 selected-episode Qwen3-Omni LoRA run. 448 eval; JSON 0.8750; contact 0.6451. Lineage only.
v2 Make answers schema-checked. Structured-JSON contract with full-8-GPU LoRA on the same split. 448 eval; JSON 0.9978; contact 0.7188. Structured-output ablation.
v3 Separate prompt/eval effects from training. Strict-label prompt/eval over the v2 adapter; no new adapter training. 448 eval; JSON 1.0000; contact 0.7210. Prompt/eval ablation.
v4 Test longer structured-JSON LoRA training. New four-epoch full-8-GPU adapter on the same selected split. 448 eval; JSON 1.0000; contact 0.7299. Overfit/metric-tradeoff evidence.
v5 Move to denser multiscale evaluation. Multiscale cap96 export with 4,032 held-out predictions. 4,032 eval; JSON 1.0000; contact 0.7865. Pinned prior release; stronger on several non-contact metrics.
v6 Publish the current Qwen 20-task row. Rank64/lr5e-5 multiscale LoRA plus verified task-specific probes. 4,032 eval; JSON 0.9990; contact 0.8177. Current public 20-task Qwen3-Omni row.

Qwen v1-v6 are run-lineage labels inside the selected-128 evidence line, not project evidence lines. Use v6 for the public 20-task Qwen3-Omni row; keep v5 as the pinned prior multiscale comparator; read v1-v4 as pipeline-hardening and ablation evidence. Full details are available in the Qwen lineage data and Qwen lineage note.

Project brief

Two public evidence lines: inspectable task lab and comparison surface.

This project has two public evidence lines: Line 1 uses one public sample episode as an inspectable task lab; Line 2 uses selected-128 public-safe derived artifacts as a same-split comparison surface for baselines and model diagnostics. The public sample remains the raw-inspectable development harness; selected-128 is the model-comparison surface.

What this is

A research-development lab for understanding synchronized egocentric multimodal data, defining embodied-AI tasks, and testing small baselines before omni-model fine-tuning.

What is implemented
  • Line 1: 1,161 aligned windows from one public sample episode
  • Line 2: selected-128 same-split comparison surface
  • 20 unified task contracts with minimal and neural evidence
  • 180 scored method-task records with direct/proxy labels
  • Research-direction maps, extension probes, and scale-up paths
What comes next

The next model-quality stage is stronger action/subtask modeling on the same held-out split, using dense/multiscale windows before requiring more raw episodes.

Data understanding

Maps one public episode into raw-inspectable synchronized windows, then connects selected-128 public-safe artifacts to same-split comparison rows.

Task design

Defines embodied-AI inputs, process modules, outputs, metrics, and case-study walkthroughs instead of treating the sample as a generic classification file.

Evaluation discipline

Keeps chronological splits, predictions, confusion matrices, leakage notes, evidence-line boundaries, and direct/proxy score labels visible before broader model-quality reads.

Scale-up readiness

Connects the same data contract to selected-128 baselines, Qwen3-Omni/Cosmos3 diagnostics, a no-new-episode enhancement pack, policy/VLA candidates, and the later Xperience-native pretraining goal.

Result snapshot

One comparison story, detailed charts in the task-suite section.

The overview keeps only the headline comparison so the same radar visuals are not repeated. Open the task-suite section for the enlarged unified radar, the 1-episode split radar, the 128-episode split radar, and the source-linked 180-record table.

1-episode line

Minimal and Neural MLP baselines cover 40/40 method-task records on the original public-sample episode.

128-episode line

Metadata, raw-feature, Qwen3-Omni, and Cosmos3 methods cover 140/140 rows with direct/proxy evidence notes preserved.

Best detailed view

The task-suite section holds the large readable radars, normalized-score notes, and the downloadable chart data.

featured

Research roadmap details

This section links the unified 20 tasks, four research tracks, current sample evidence, and the multi-episode Qwen3-Omni scale-up path.

tracks 4 tasks 20 setup unified roadmap phases 5
verified

Multimodal episode pipeline

One Xperience-10M public sample episode is converted into aligned windows and a documented feature contract.

frames 5,821 windows 1,161 features 8,546
verified

Task suite and baseline heads

The unified task suite has minimal and neural baseline evidence across one 20-axis task surface with shared windows, splits, and label discipline.

tasks 20 minimal heads 20 neural heads 20
verified

Dataset source alignment

The public description is aligned to the official gated Xperience-10M Hugging Face dataset card, including modalities, scale, access, and current project coverage. The source snapshot records 31.9 TB on the HF dataset surface, an about-1PB full-scale storage statement, 12,103 episode folders as upstream metadata, not a local data inventory, public sample license cc-by-nc-4.0, HOMIE Toolkit and Rerun 0.29.0 source tooling, and the official limited diversity note. See the source-alignment record for exact provenance.

full dataset HF gated sample scope 1 episode raw data mirrored no
verified

Public research artifacts

Metrics, figures, walkthroughs, baseline weights, Qwen3-Omni results, and Cosmos3 public-safe packages are staged across GitHub, GitHub Pages, and Hugging Face.

tasks 20 baselines minimal + neural project route tabs
verified diagnostic

Qwen3-Omni held-out pilot

The first selected-episode LoRA pilot is packaged with real held-out predictions and metrics. It proves the pipeline, while the weak scores make it a baseline for error analysis.

split 96 / 16 / 16 test windows 4,032 JSON validity 99.90%
current plan

No-new-episode stress plan

Shows how the current selected split can be stressed without more episodes: dense windows, hierarchical labels, raw-feature shards, and `multiscale_20s10_40s20_80s40` as the next export target.

current windows 3,808 multiscale estimate 106,095 data reference selected-128 enhancement plan
not redistributed

Data governance

Raw MP4/HDF5/RRD files, private gated Xperience-10M data, and full Qwen weights are excluded from the public repo and HF mirrors.

raw Xperience-10M excluded full Qwen weights excluded derived artifacts included

Aligned with the official dataset card.

The official Xperience-10M card describes a gated, large-scale 4D egocentric multimodal dataset. This project records that full upstream scope while focusing the implemented artifacts on one public sample episode. The source-alignment record keeps 31.9 TB, about-1PB, 12,103 episode folders, cc-by-nc-4.0, HOMIE Toolkit, Rerun 0.29.0, not a local data inventory, and limited diversity visible on the public site.

Official dataset

Xperience-10M is a gated large-scale egocentric multimodal dataset for embodied AI, robotics, spatial intelligence, and world modeling.

official HF dataset

Line 1 public sample

The one-episode line builds the inspectable 20-task lab. Use Line 2 for selected-128 held-out comparison.

sample dataset

Public sample inspection

One public sample episode is exposed through the raw browser and modality atlas: synchronized video, embedded audio, HDF5 annotation groups, depth, pose/SLAM, mocap, IMU, calibration, language-derived signals, and source links in one place.

open raw browserraw manifeststream metadata

Data explorer analysis

Compare the one-sample line, selected-128 feature exports, and Hugging Face gated full-dataset metadata with scope stats, split counts, modality breakdowns, and readable charts.

open analysisanalysis report

Multi-episode pilot

The selected 128-episode Qwen3-Omni LoRA v6 diagnostic run is verified with 4,032 held-out test predictions and 99.90% JSON validity. Action/subtask metrics are still weak, so this remains a baseline for error analysis.

LoRA adapterv5/v6 comparison

Data boundary

Raw MP4, HDF5, RRD files are streamed from the official public sample source when opened here; private gated data and full Qwen weights are not redistributed in this project.

data notice

Implemented subset

The public task lab uses one sample episode with 5,821 frames, 1,161 aligned windows, 8,546-dimensional task inputs, and 20 integrated task contracts.

task suitetask contract data

Covered now

Action/subtask labels, next-action prediction, temporal diagnostics, hand trajectory, contact, object relevance, caption grounding, retrieval, reconstruction, misalignment, long-horizon forecasting, interaction text, action-object relation, sensor bridging, camera sync, and transition timing.

summary metrics

Responsible use

This project is for research exploration and excludes identity recognition, surveillance, biometric profiling, sensitive-attribute inference, and safety-critical deployment.

use notes

Later milestones

Full audio-visual learning, caption generation, depth-pixel prediction, SLAM estimation, neural rendering, policy learning, cross-episode generalization, held-out Qwen3-Omni evaluation, and future Xperience-native pretraining.

native pretraining

Data explorer analysis.

Read the data at three separate scales: the official public sample episode, the selected 128-episode feature surface, and authenticated file metadata for the Hugging Face-hosted gated full dataset. The charts are generated by a reproducible script and keep raw data boundaries explicit.

selected scope / public sample

Public sample episode: inspectable raw evidence.

The public sample is the only raw episode mirrored into the browser. Use it to understand file roles, synchronized streams, HDF5 contents, modality features, and how one episode becomes 20-frame task windows.

Raw contents6 MP4 streams, audio in MP4, annotation.hdf5, and visualization.rrd. Training view1,161 aligned windows with 8,546 feature dimensions. Best useFile inspection, task construction, and local reproducibility. BoundaryOne official episode; no diversity or scale claim.
1. Inspect one episodeOpen media, HDF5, RRD, labels, and synchronized windows directly.
2. Score selected 128Use public-safe derived rows for same-split baselines and model probes.
3. Read HF full scaleUse authenticated Hugging Face file metadata to understand upstream corpus size.
evidence map

What each data scale can answer.

The goal is to make the data understandable without mixing raw public sample inspection, selected-128 derived artifacts, and Hugging Face gated full-dataset metadata into one ambiguous inventory.

Data scale Use case What is counted Boundary
Public sample Raw file roles, synchronized streams, action/object timelines, and how one episode becomes task windows. Files, frames, 20-frame windows, modality feature dimensions, action labels, object labels, HDF5 groups. One official sample episode only; it is not a diversity or generalization claim.
Selected 128 Same-split baselines, model scoring surfaces, feature export density, and 128-episode task coverage. Selected episodes, splits, size bands, feature rows, multiscale exports, raw20/proxy status. Public-safe derived artifacts; raw selected-episode data remains governed by the official gated dataset.
Full HF dataset Scale of the upstream dataset: sessions, episode folders, file counts, file types, and storage footprint. Authenticated Hub file metadata: HDF5 count, MP4 count, RRD count, complete episode folders, total bytes. Metadata-only. Dataset Viewer row/stat endpoints are gated and raw contents are not redistributed.
scale comparisonall scopes

One sample, selected 128, and the HF full dataset are different reading scopes.

Log-scale bars keep the large jumps visible without hiding the small public-sample line.

Scope ladder chart comparing public sample, selected 128 episodes, and the Hugging Face gated full dataset by episode count, window rows, and training bytes.
sample feature anatomypublic sample

Video dominates the 8,546-dimensional public-sample input.

Motion capture, depth, language, pose/SLAM, audio, and inertial signals remain explicit feature groups.

Bar chart of public sample feature dimensions by modality group.
sample timeline labelspublic sample

Window labels show which actions occupy the sample.

This separates what the one-episode line can and cannot represent before the task cards.

Bar chart of the most frequent action labels by 20-frame window count.
selected-128 exportsselected 128

Feature rows grow by export density and window scale.

The selected-128 split is stable; sparse, Qwen v6 multiscale, and dense compact exports expose different row counts.

Stacked bar chart of selected-128 processed rows by train, validation, and test split.
HF full-dataset metadataHF metadata

The Hugging Face full dataset is mostly repeated episode file structure.

The counts come from the gated ropedia-ai/xperience-10m repository on Hugging Face. Each complete episode usually has one annotation HDF5 and six MP4 streams; RRD viewer recordings are optional.

Log-scale file composition chart for the gated Hugging Face full-dataset metadata.

Source boundary: the full-corpus counts are the Hugging Face-hosted dataset version: authenticated Hugging Face Hub file metadata for ropedia-ai/xperience-10m. They describe repository scale and file organization; they do not inspect private row contents or redistribute raw data.

Raw public sample browser.

Open each official Xperience-10M sample file from the project page. Video and audio use compact browser previews derived from the official MP4 files, with direct links beside them for the full raw Hugging Face sources. HDF5 and RRD files are shown with their role, size, organization, and direct source links.

fisheye_cam0.mp4

Fisheye camera 0 stream and the public sample audio source. This file can be played as video and as the embedded audio track.

video + audio

Playing a 12 second fast-start preview derived from the official raw MP4. Use the source link for the complete file.

Embedded audio preview from fisheye_cam0.mp4

Video features feed visual tasks; the embedded audio stream feeds audio ablation and acoustic feature blocks.

Sample folder organization

The official public sample is one episode folder. The task suite reads the HDF5 annotations and six synchronized MP4 streams, then writes 20-frame windows with a 5-frame stride.

xperience-10m-sample/
  annotation.hdf5
  fisheye_cam0.mp4
  fisheye_cam1.mp4
  fisheye_cam2.mp4
  fisheye_cam3.mp4
  stereo_left.mp4
  stereo_right.mp4
  visualization.rrd

annotation.hdf5 group map

The raw HDF5 is a binary container, so the browser shows its organization rather than loading the whole file into memory.

calibrationCamera intrinsics/extrinsics and static alignment values.
captionJSON text with actions, objects, interactions, segments, and global summary.
depthDepth maps and confidence channels aligned to the episode timeline.
full_body_mocapFull-body joint and contact signals for human motion modeling.
hand_mocapLeft and right hand joint trajectories used by forecast tasks.
imuAccelerometer and gyroscope streams sampled above video rate.
metadataEpisode metadata, frame indexing, and source bookkeeping.
slamCamera trajectory, pose, and sparse SLAM point-cloud information.
videoVideo metadata and per-frame alignment information.

Stream-to-feature use

The source streams are summarized once here, next to the playable files and HDF5 map.

VideoSix synchronized MP4 streams feed RGB, fisheye, stereo, and frame-statistic task inputs.
AudioThe embedded fisheye_cam0 audio feeds acoustic feature blocks and audio ablations.
DepthDepth maps and confidence channels provide geometry signals for spatial and reconstruction probes.
Pose / SLAMTrajectory, camera pose, and sparse map values become position and orientation features.
Motion captureBody and hand joint tracks support motion, contact, hand forecast, and policy-style targets.
InertialAccelerometer and gyroscope streams become wearable-motion statistics.
LanguageObject tags and caption-derived labels become semantic targets; raw caption text remains governed by the official sample.

Small derived modality thumbnails remain in the modality atlas data; raw MP4, HDF5, and RRD files are not redistributed.

Xperience-10M 20-task suite.

Task map, radar comparisons, task cards, and the 180-result table are kept in one section. The map introduces the task axes, the score surfaces compare methods, and each task card lists input, process, output, metric, and all nine public method scores.

Open full generated task-map figure Large overview kept here for visual scanning after the compact index.
Infographic showing Xperience-10M task families with compact modality cards and visible thumbnails

Unified plus split radars

The unified radar keeps all nine methods in one comparison board, but groups them into small-multiple panels so each method family can be read directly. The split radars separate the 1-episode Minimal/NN baseline comparison from the 128-episode metadata/raw, Qwen3-Omni v6 LoRA, and Cosmos3-Super/Nano comparison.

Metric normalization

Higher-is-better metrics are normalized to 0-1; lower-is-better metrics are converted to best/value within the task. The SVG uses sqrt(normalized score) only for visual radius, while raw values, linear normalized scores, status reasons, sources, and compact proxy notes remain in the data mirrors.

Score/proxy audit

The matrix has 180/180 scored method-task records: 174 direct scores and 6 compact-proxy scores. The audit records the source artifact, metric key, and proxy reason for each marked cell.

1-Episode 20-Task Radar

Minimal and Neural MLP are both scored on all 20 public-sample task contracts in one enlarged panel without 128-episode methods competing for attention.

Single-episode 20-task radar comparing Minimal and Neural MLP across all 20 scored task axes
Open full 9-method radar board Use after the split radars when you need all methods in one grouped visual analysis board.

All 20 task cards in the same suite.

Each card uses its assigned icon and shows the task name, input sources, process, output target, metric, and compact nine-method score panel. Use the filters for scanning; the cards stay tied to the task map, radar axes, and 180-record matrix.

Assigned visual language for the 20 tasks.

The overall generated atlas keeps the icon family visible, while each task card below uses its own crisp assigned SVG for reliable loading and public mirrors.

Generated 4 by 5 atlas of the 20 Xperience-10M task icons

Interactive task walkthrough.

Each task uses a common research name and a concrete case study, then opens into the input, middle modules, output, modality evidence, metric, and current limitation.

Representative sample modality for the selected task
Step 1 / 4 · Input
Action Recognition Egocentric Action Recognition

Input: inspect the 20-frame multimodal window before choosing the target.

01 / 12
supervised multiclass classifier

Action Recognition

In the coffee-making sample, a pouring window maps to the current action label.

    Metric: macro-F1. Minimal 0.0500; neural MLP 0.0148.

    Current limitation: single-episode chronological split.

    Evaluation protocol is explicit.

    The protocol is generated from committed metric artifacts and records the exact data unit, split, task targets, leakage controls, and current limitations before score comparison.

    Data unit

    One 20-frame aligned window from the public sample episode, stride 5 frames, 1,161 windows total, represented by 8,546 synchronized multimodal dimensions.

    evaluation protocol

    Split policy

    Single-episode chronological 70/30 train/test split. This avoids random future-window mixing; cross-episode generalization is measured in the later multi-episode pilot.

    protocol document

    Metric contract

    All 20 tasks list input, target, primary metric, baseline score, and source artifact path in the unified suite file.

    task contract data

    Leakage controls

    Scalers fit on train windows only; future labels, target-side signals, caption/object labels, and contact labels stay on the target side unless explicitly queried.

    builder script

    Audio ablation

    Audio and no-audio variants are evaluated across the walkthrough-backed task contracts under the same chronological split.

    audio summary

    Foundation track selection

    Qwen3-Omni is the first trainable baseline, Cosmos 3 is the world-model track with a camera-pose proxy forward-dynamics contract ready for trainer work, policy models wait for robot-compatible action targets, and Xperience-native pretraining remains a later full-corpus goal.

    backbone plan

    Next evaluation stage

    This public-sample run covers single-episode task development. The selected multi-episode Qwen3-Omni final diagnostic result is verified and meets the JSON-validity target; Cosmos3-Nano has a verified future-window compatibility package; and Cosmos3-Super has a verified base-weight JSON-task evaluation plus a fine-tuned forward-dynamics LoRA branch. The next stage is action/subtask error analysis, stronger held-out metrics, and policy-target conversion.

    result comparison

    Selected-128 next stressor

    Before adding episodes, the suite should try `multiscale_20s10_40s20_80s40`, hierarchical action/subtask targets, label-normalized scoring, and compact raw-feature shards for unsupported tasks.

    enhancement data

    Public-safe scale-up gate

    Future Omni, Cosmos, and policy tracks use the same episode split discipline, training metadata, held-out predictions, metrics, run report, and public-safe package gate.

    scale-up status

    From raw episode to research artifacts.

    Every script works from one data contract: aligned multimodal windows, explicit labels, cached feature extraction, and a manifest that makes omitted modalities visible.

    from data to score One pipeline, five verifiable checkpoints.

    This is the shortest way to understand the method section: start from official synchronized files, build aligned windows, create task targets, run method heads or model probes, then publish source-linked metrics.

    Official streams

    RGB/fisheye/stereo video, audio, HDF5 annotations, pose, depth, calibration, IMU, mocap, and Rerun visualization sources.

    Aligned windows

    20-frame windows with a 5-frame stride keep the input unit consistent across task heads and selected-128 exports.

    Task targets

    Each window maps to one of the 20 contracts: classification, forecasting, retrieval, reconstruction, synchronization, or regression.

    Method rows

    Minimal, Neural MLP, selected-128 metadata/raw baselines, Qwen3-Omni v6, Cosmos3-Super, and Cosmos3-Nano produce the public method rows.

    Verified outputs

    Metrics, predictions, matrices, radar data, validators, and mirror parity checks are published with direct/proxy status preserved.

    Verified Xperience-10M multimodal pipeline diagram

    Qwen3-Omni LoRA training flow

    Raw valid episodes move through split validation, parallel export, video/audio/text formatting, sensor-bridge features, LoRA training, and sealed held-out evaluation.

    What the figure represents

    It documents the selected 128-episode final diagnostic result and the action/subtask improvement path for stronger held-out metrics.

    Detailed Qwen3-Omni LoRA training pipeline from raw Xperience-10M episodes to adapter outputs, predictions, metrics, and reports

    What this project enables

    It demonstrates the full development loop: reading Xperience-10M sample data, aligning modalities, converting them into model-ready windows, defining meaningful tasks, producing metrics, and packaging artifacts for continued research.

    What still needs more data

    General embodied-intelligence model quality requires many episodes and held-out episode splits; the public sample is the development harness for that next stage.

    Model inputs are traceable.

    Each task reads an aligned window, not a black-box feature blob. The cards below show the path from public-sample streams to window rows and feature groups, then the chart shows the size of each input block.

    1 / raw source

    Start from official streams

    Six synchronized MP4 camera streams, embedded audio, HDF5 annotations, depth, pose/SLAM, mocap, IMU, calibration, and language-derived fields remain tied to the public sample episode.

    Open sample browser
    2 / aligned window

    Slice into the same unit

    The task suite builds 20-frame windows with a 5-frame stride. Each row records episode id, start frame, end frame, center frame, timestamps, and split assignment.

    Open window manifest
    3 / feature contract

    Name every input block

    The feature contract groups the 8,546 dimensions by modality and derived signal. Omitted or target-side fields stay visible so leakage checks can be audited.

    Open feature contract
    source modality

    Where the signal comes from: video, audio, depth, pose/SLAM, mocap, IMU, calibration, or language-derived annotation fields.

    feature block

    The named column group used by Minimal baselines, Neural MLP heads, and public-sample task cards.

    chart width

    Bar length means number of input dimensions. It is not a model score and it is not a task ranking.

    Feature block chart showing input dimension counts for hand joints, body joints, pose, IMU, depth, six video streams, audio, language text, SLAM point cloud, and calibration

    Read this as provenance. A task card may say “20-frame multimodal window”; this section shows which source streams and derived feature groups make up that window before any task-specific label is attached.

    Back to task cards

    The baseline task heads share four head families.

    The diagram separates the shared episode-window representation from the task-specific heads, so the task contracts stay readable before scaling to larger models.

    Verified minimal and neural architecture diagram for Xperience-10M task heads

    Results by evidence line.

    Read results in this order: choose the line, open the matching radar, inspect the matrix row, then check proxy flags before interpreting totals.

    Result Interpretation and Limitations These results are diagnostic, not a final model-quality leaderboard.

    This project has two public evidence lines. Line 1 uses one public sample episode as an inspectable task lab. Line 2 uses a selected-128 public-safe comparison surface for same-split baselines and model diagnostics. The current public results do not estimate full Xperience-10M corpus performance.

    The 180-record matrix should be read task-by-task. Raw metric values are the citeable values. Radar-normalized values are visual summaries only and should not be used as leaderboard scores.

    Direct and compact-proxy scores remain separate. Proxy-marked cells are bounded public-safe substitutes where a direct raw target is not publicly available; they should not be treated as direct raw-target evidence.

    The selected-128 surface is a diagnostic comparison subset, not a distributionally representative sample of the full Xperience-10M corpus. Broader model-quality claims require larger episode coverage, locked held-out splits, seed variance, and episode-level confidence intervals.

    Because 20-frame windows with stride 5 can create local temporal overlap, split construction matters. Window counts should be read as evaluation units, not statistically independent human-experience episodes.

    High local baseline scores are within-surface sanity checks, not proof of general embodied-intelligence performance. The Qwen3-Omni and Cosmos rows are model-family diagnostics; weak action/subtask results are kept visible because they define the next error-analysis and model-improvement stage.

    !
    Interpretation note: read these scores as task-definition and diagnostic evidence, not final model-quality claims.

    Some task metrics are intentionally hard and can be low, especially for action/subtask labels in the current selected-128 diagnostic runs. The current value of this work is the public-safe evaluation pipeline, traceable targets, split discipline, direct/proxy score labeling, and failure-analysis surface for future model improvement.

    i
    Cite raw metric values; use radar values only as visual summaries.

    The raw value keeps the task metric and scale, such as macro-F1, MRR, MAE, or R2. The normalized radar value is a 0-1 plotting transform for comparing shapes across tasks.

    cite this Raw metric value

    The score printed in each table cell is the value emitted by the runner or verified package. Use this value in text, tables, and comparisons.

    visual only Normalized radar value

    The radar converts mixed metrics to a 0-1 plotting scale. It helps pattern recognition, but it is not a replacement for the raw metric.

    status first Direct vs compact-proxy

    Direct scores use the task target. Compact-proxy scores are bounded substitutes where a raw public target is unavailable, and stay marked before comparison.

    Result citation ledger
    Use case Use this value Why Where it appears
    Write a paper or README number Raw metric value This is emitted by the runner or verified result package and keeps the original metric scale. 180-result table cells, result JSON, method summaries.
    Compare shapes across many tasks Normalized radar value This is a 0-1 plotting transform for visual comparison only; cite the raw metric beside it. Unified radar and split radar charts.
    Interpret a low-availability target Compact-proxy score plus its audit note The task target is represented by a bounded substitute, so the proxy label and reason travel with the value. Proxy audit, matrix badges, selected-128 baseline rows.
    01 Choose the line

    Use 1 episode for the task lab. Use 128 episodes for the selected comparison surface.

    02 Open the radar

    Single-episode radar shows Minimal vs Neural MLP. The 128-episode radar shows metadata/raw baselines, Qwen3-Omni v6, Cosmos3-Super, and Cosmos3-Nano.

    03 Inspect the matrix

    Each score keeps method, task, metric key, source artifact, and status.

    04 Check proxy cells

    Six selected-128 scores are compact proxies and stay marked in the audit.

    1 episode results

    Task-lab evidence

    Minimal and Neural MLP heads are both scored on all 20 public-sample task contracts. All 40 scores are direct task-target metrics.

    best read as

    A reproducible public task suite and baseline behavior check.

    2methods 20task axes 40/40scores
    Open 1-episode radar
    128 episode results

    Scale-up evidence

    Metadata/raw baselines, Qwen3-Omni v6 LoRA, Cosmos3-Super Reasoner, and Cosmos3-Nano Future Window use the aligned 128-episode surface. It has 134 direct scores plus 6 compact-proxy scores.

    best read as

    A same-split comparison table with explicit source and proxy status.

    7methods 20task axes 140/140scores
    Open 128-episode radar
    Line Methods Tasks Scored records Direct scores Proxy scores Machine-readable source
    1 sample episode 2 20 40/40 40 0 single-episode radar data
    128 selected episodes 7 20 140/140 134 6 compact-proxy scores, each source-linked and reasoned. 128-episode radar data
    Total public matrix 9 20 180/180 174 6 two-line result summary data
    Line Block Methods Records Evidence type Primary artifact
    1 sample episode Task-head baselines Minimal; Neural MLP 40 direct Direct target metrics on the public sample windows. single-episode radar data
    128 selected episodes Aligned baseline heads Metadata simple/NN; raw-feature simple/NN 74 direct + 6 compact-proxy Processed-target metrics where available; proxy cells remain source-linked. score/proxy audit
    128 selected episodes Qwen3-Omni series Qwen3-Omni v6 LoRA 20 direct Verified selected-128 LoRA and task-specific probe artifacts. model comparison data
    128 selected episodes Cosmos3 series Cosmos3-Super Reasoner; Cosmos3-Nano Future Window 40 direct Verified reasoner and future-window public-safe artifacts; forward-dynamics LoRA is a separate adapter artifact outside the 20-task method rows. model comparison data
    180-result table

    All methods x all 20 tasks, in one source-linked table.

    Each cell shows the raw metric value to cite, the normalized radar value, the metric key, and a direct/proxy badge. The table is generated from the same structured matrix data used by the radar, so values stay aligned across GitHub, the website, and Hugging Face mirrors.

    180method-task records
    9method rows
    20task columns
    174direct scores
    6compact-proxy scores
    direct task scoreiA metric computed against the task target directly. This is the preferred score type in the 20-task matrix. compact proxy scoreiA bounded proxy metric when a direct raw target is not publicly available. It stays explicit so proxy targets are not mistaken for direct raw-target reads. raw value is citeableiThe original metric value emitted by the runner or verified package. This is the value to cite. normalized value is radar-onlyiA 0-1 plotting value used only to draw comparable radar polygons across metrics with different scales.
    open full 180-score audit table Use this after the citation ledger. It contains the method summary, every method-task cell, direct/proxy badges, raw metric values, normalized radar values, and source-aligned evidence notes.
    MethodiOne named method family in the matrix, such as Minimal, 128ep Raw NN, Qwen3-Omni v6, or Cosmos3-Super. LineiA reading lane for a group of results: Line 1 is one public sample episode; Line 2 is selected-128 held-out comparison. RecordsiOne method evaluated on one task. 9 methods x 20 tasks gives 180 public result records. DirectiA metric computed against the task target directly. This is the preferred score type in the 20-task matrix. ProxyiA bounded proxy metric when a direct raw target is not publicly available. It stays explicit so proxy targets are not mistaken for direct raw-target reads. Scope
    Loading result summary...
    Raw and normalized scores for 9 methods across 20 Xperience-10M tasks.
    MethodLoading tasks...
    Loading 180-result matrix...

    Best-practice reading rule: compare methods within the same evidence line first, then use the proxy badges before interpreting cross-method totals. Six compact-proxy cells are intentionally visible rather than blended into direct raw-target scores.

    Small baselines, no hidden machinery.

    Motion-only and all-feature classifiers use lightweight heads so the comparison stays readable on a laptop and easy to inspect. They now sit beside the result matrix instead of opening a separate results page.

    Motion-only action

    0.9688macro-F1, 18 classes

    Current all-feature action

    0.9829macro-F1, 8,546 dimensions

    Motion-only subtask

    0.9528macro-F1, 14 classes

    Current all-feature subtask

    0.9173macro-F1, chronological caveats
    Macro-F1 comparison chart

    Neural MLP heads, same task contracts.

    The neural baseline keeps the same windows, splits, and leakage filters, then swaps in small PyTorch MLP heads. Read it as a nonlinear-head check before heavier Qwen3/Cosmos model branches.

    Neural hand forecast

    0.1079MPJPE, down from 0.8647 minimal

    Neural temporal order

    0.8520F1, adjacent-window diagnostic

    Neural misalignment

    0.7153F1, shifted motion/visual/audio pairs

    Neural cross-modal retrieval

    0.1300MRR; ridge remains stronger here
    Neural MLP episode task score chart Minimal versus neural MLP episode task score chart

    Diagnostics separate memorization from signal.

    These charts keep the main lesson visible: within-episode labels can be easy under some splits, while retrieval, grounding, forecasting, and alignment remain the useful probes.

    Episode task suite score chart Cross modal retrieval chart Neural MLP task score chart Minimal versus neural score chart Measured audio delta chart across walkthrough-backed task contracts

    Open the single-episode explorer to inspect window-level labels, predictions, modality statistics, object labels, and diagnostic scores. The audio ablation summary records the task-by-task audio contribution.

    One episode becomes a benchmark contract

    The public sample is converted into 5,821 frames, 1,161 aligned 20-frame windows, and an 8,546-dimensional representation for repeatable task evaluation.

    research takeaways

    Chronological split exposes class shift

    All-feature action reaches 0.9829 macro-F1 on its local split, while the chronological action head in the core task suite is 0.0500 macro-F1 with four unseen later action labels.

    takeaways

    Neural heads help dynamics

    Hand MPJPE improves from 0.8647 to 0.1079; temporal-order F1 rises from 0.5400 to 0.8520; misalignment F1 rises from 0.5052 to 0.7153.

    metrics

    Retrieval and reconstruction remain open

    Ridge/cosine retrieval remains stronger than the neural projection here, and cross-modal feature reconstruction still has negative R2.

    retrieval metrics

    Scale means held-out episodes

    The next credible model-quality unit is a held-out multi-episode pilot across different sessions, not more adjacent windows from one sample.

    scale-up status

    Four research directions over the same 20 tasks.

    This is the 4-direction layer of the public structure. Each direction groups task evidence by research question; it does not create a separate task set. Each task is mapped as direct, proxy, or diagnostic evidence using the same minimal and Neural MLP baseline contracts.

    relationship map 20 tasks / 4 directions / 3 pipelines / 1 unified model target.

    The structure is fixed: the 20 tasks are scored contracts, the four directions group what those scores study, the three pipelines define training recipes, and the unified embodied model is the long-term integration target.

    20
    scored task layer One unified task suite.

    Every metric, radar axis, and method row uses these same 20 task contracts.

    4
    4-direction layer Four research views over the same tasks.

    Human motion, 3D/4D reconstruction, egocentric interaction, and world modeling are groupings over the same tasks.

    3
    3-pipeline layer Three ways to train larger models.

    Spatial intelligence, human-video world models, and vision-language-action models reuse the same files with different input-output recipes.

    1
    unified target One embodied foundation model goal.

    The pipeline outputs converge toward perception, 3D memory, language, action, and planning in one model family.

    score question If it has a metric, it belongs to the 20-task layer.

    Task cards, radars, and the 180-record table all use the same numbered task IDs.

    research question If it explains what the evidence studies, it belongs to the 4-direction layer.

    Directions A-D group the same 20 tasks. They are not extra tasks or a second tier.

    training question If it describes model inputs and targets, it belongs to the 3-pipeline layer.

    Spatial, world-model, and VLA pipelines are recipes for future scale-up and task-grounded model training.

    synthesis question If it combines pipeline abilities, it belongs to the unified-model target.

    This is the expandable integration goal, not an extra scored task axis in the 180-result matrix.

    Labeled Ropedia Xperience-10M Task Suite relationship map showing 20 task contracts flowing into four named research directions, three foundation-model training pipelines, and one unified embodied foundation model target, with each layer open to expand.
    20 tasksScore axes used by every method row. 4 directionsResearch questions for reading those scores. 3 pipelinesTraining recipes for larger foundation models. 1 unified modelFuture integration target, not a new score axis.
    20 task contracts Every score axis is one of these tasks.

    The generated image uses one node per task; this list gives the exact public task names.

    1. 01Action Recognition
    2. 02Procedure Step Recognition
    3. 03Action Boundary Detection
    4. 04Next-Action Prediction
    5. 05Hand Trajectory Forecasting
    6. 06Contact State Prediction
    7. 07Object Relevance Prediction
    8. 08Language Grounding
    9. 09Cross-Modal Retrieval
    10. 10Cross-Modal Reconstruction
    11. 11Temporal Order Verification
    12. 12Multimodal Synchronization Detection
    13. 13Long-Horizon Next-Action Forecasting
    14. 14Long-Horizon Next-Subtask Forecasting
    15. 15Interaction Text Prediction
    16. 16Action-Object Relation Prediction
    17. 17Future Object-Set Forecasting
    18. 18IMU-to-Hand Pose Reconstruction
    19. 19Camera-View Synchronization Retrieval
    20. 20Time-to-Next-Transition Regression
    4 research directions The same tasks are grouped by research question.

    Tasks can support more than one direction. This layer answers what the scores study; it is not a separate benchmark or task tier.

    1. AHuman Modeling & Motion Understanding
    2. B3D/4D Reconstruction & Neural Rendering
    3. CEgocentric Vision & Interaction
    4. DScene Reconstruction & World Modeling
    3 foundation pipelines The training tracks reuse the task and modality contracts.

    These are scale-up recipes for model training. They answer how the same files can be turned into larger model inputs and targets.

    1. 1Spatial intelligence models
    2. 2Human-video world models
    3. 3Vision-language-action models
    1 unified target The pipelines converge into one embodied model goal.

    This target integrates perception, 3D memory, language, action, and planning. It is a research direction for scale-up, not a tenth method or twenty-first task.

    1. PPerception and multimodal input
    2. M3D memory and scene state
    3. LLanguage-grounded reasoning
    4. AAction and planning
    scored contracts 20 tasks

    Action, subtask, object, language, motion, synchronization, retrieval, and forecasting targets evaluated by each public method row.

    research grouping 4 directions

    Human Modeling & Motion Understanding; 3D/4D Reconstruction & Neural Rendering; Egocentric Vision & Interaction; Scene Reconstruction & World Modeling.

    training tracks 3 foundation pipelines

    Spatial intelligence models; Human-video world models; Vision-language-action models.

    synthesis target 1 unified embodied model

    A long-term model target where perception, spatial memory, language, action, and planning are trained against the same evidence structure.

    20 tasks are the score axes. -> 4 directions organize what the scores study. -> 3 pipelines describe how to train larger models. -> 1 unified model is the integration target.
    partially implemented

    A. Human Modeling & Motion Understanding

    Direct evidence comes from hand trajectory forecasting and contact prediction; action and object relevance are supporting proxies.

    2direct2proxy0diagnostic
    prerequisite evidence

    B. 3D/4D Reconstruction & Neural Rendering

    Cross-modal retrieval, modality reconstruction, and misalignment detection check reconstruction prerequisites, not full geometry.

    0direct2proxy1diagnostic
    strongest implemented

    C. Egocentric Vision & Interaction

    Action, subtask, transition, next-action, object, caption, order, and alignment tasks directly stress egocentric understanding.

    6direct2proxy3diagnostic
    world-model prerequisites

    D. Scene Reconstruction & World Modeling

    Current probes cover task state, object relevance, retrieval, reconstruction, temporal order, and alignment but no persistent map yet.

    0direct6proxy3diagnostic
    Coverage of the original Xperience-10M tasks across four research directions

    Baseline 1: minimal heads

    Softmax, logistic, ridge, and retrieval heads keep every input/output contract readable. They are the first sanity check for whether a task is well-posed.

    Baseline 2: neural MLP heads

    Small PyTorch MLP classifiers/regressors reuse the same features and splits. They test nonlinear gains before heavier Omni fine-tuning.

    Unified 20-task evidence and provenance.

    All 20 tasks live in the same task table, task-card grid, radar, and 180-record result matrix. Historical result paths are retained only for exact provenance links.

    Unified task artifact package

    The public task package has one structured 20-task contract, per-task metrics, prediction/rank files, summaries, radar charts, and the 180-record method-task matrix.

    Inspect task-contract source · Read 180-result table · View unified radar

    One setup, one task surface

    Every task uses the same 20-frame window unit, 5-frame stride, 8,546-dimensional feature manifest, chronological split discipline, and minimal/neural comparison pattern unless a task-specific leakage rule removes target-side features.

    Historical provenance data and historical provenance chart remain available for exact source tracing.

    Four Xperience-10M research-direction extension probes with minimal and neural metrics
    A / motion

    Body and Hand Motion Intensity

    Case: classify fast reach/pour windows as high motion and steady holding windows as low motion.

    Input: non-mocap video, depth, pose, IMU, SLAM, calibration, and language features.

    Output: high_motion or low_motion.

    0.7827minimal macro-F10.7986neural macro-F1
    B / views

    Multi-View Consistency Retrieval

    Case: retrieve the synchronized stereo-left window from a fisheye-camera query.

    Input: fisheye_cam0 video features against stereo_left candidate features.

    Output: ranked synchronized view candidates.

    0.5534minimal MRR0.3469neural MRR
    C / phase

    Action Phase Progress Estimation

    Case: estimate whether a Pour coffee window is near the start, middle, or end of its action segment.

    Input: non-caption multimodal features.

    Output: 0-to-1 progress inside the current action.

    0.3416minimal MAE0.3038neural MAE
    D / world

    Short-Horizon Ego-Motion Forecasting

    Case: predict how the camera translation changes over the next 20 frames.

    Input: current sensors excluding camera translation and captions.

    Output: future camera-translation delta vector.

    0.1989minimal MAE0.0989neural MAE

    What changed

    The four research directions now have coded extension probes, prediction/rank CSVs, structured metrics, project summaries, and charts generated from real sample-window features.

    What still needs scale

    A full research result still needs many Xperience-10M episodes, held-out episode splits, stronger encoders, and direction-specific models such as body priors, renderers, or persistent scene graphs.

    Research roadmap.

    The project path moves from the current public-sample task lab to the latest verified Qwen3-Omni diagnostic run, same-split 128-episode baseline alignment, a no-new-episode enhancement pack, action/subtask error analysis, robustness runs, world/policy tracks, and the future Xperience Embodied Foundation Model pretraining goal.

    Roadmap stages

    Current results, next gates, and scale-up targets.

    The roadmap connects shipped public-sample work, the selected-128 pilot, active quality work, and later model-training goals.

    1. 1. Public-sample task labTask contracts, windows, baselines, neural heads, walkthroughs, and figures.
    2. 2. Selected-128 pilotSame-split baselines, Qwen3-Omni diagnostics, and public-safe result packages.
    3. 3. Scale-up pathQuality analysis, robustness runs, world/policy tracks, and Xperience-native pretraining.
    implemented

    Public-Sample Task Lab

    One public episode is converted into aligned windows, task contracts, minimal baselines, neural heads, walkthroughs, and figures.

    Entry

    Public Xperience-10M sample episode available.

    Evidence

    Status, protocol, takeaways, summary metrics, and episode-task outputs.

    implemented

    Multi-Episode Data Preparation

    Prepare official gated episodes while preserving episode-level separation and recording missing-view coverage. The first selected split is available for Qwen3-Omni diagnostics.

    Entry

    Gated data access and enough storage for selected episodes.

    Evidence

    Selected-episode plan, data boundary, preparation notes, and verified package summary.

    verified latest run

    Qwen3-Omni LoRA Latest Diagnostic Branch

    Train lightweight adapters on selected prepared episodes and evaluate on held-out episodes with committed predictions, metrics, and run reports.

    Entry

    Selected episodes prepared with no train/test episode leakage.

    Evidence

    Verified result summary, v5/v6 comparison, dataset manifest, training metadata, progress logs, metrics, and predictions.

    verified companion result

    128-Episode Same-Split Simple/NN Baselines

    Align simple metadata/text baselines, raw-feature proxies, and neural MLP baselines to the same selected 96/16/16 split and the unified 20-task axes used by the public result matrix.

    Entry

    Derived Qwen JSONL export for the selected 96/16/16 split.

    Evidence

    Baseline alignment report, summary metrics, task metrics, and the 128-episode baseline runner.

    current no-new-episode plan

    Selected-128 enhancement stage

    Use the same selected split, estimate dense/multiscale window exports, define hierarchical action/subtask targets, and prioritize raw-feature shards for tasks that metadata baselines cannot cover.

    Entry

    Current 3,808-window selected 96/16/16 export and verified Qwen v4 metrics.

    Evidence

    Enhancement note, structured enhancement data, dense-window CSV, and the enhancement builder script.

    active next step

    Action/Subtask Error-Analysis Pass

    Keep the 96/16/16 split, tighten JSON decoding or target formatting, and analyze action/subtask failures before presenting stronger model-quality numbers.

    Entry

    The final diagnostic package is verified, meets strict JSON validity, and exposes weak action/subtask quality.

    Evidence

    Updated quality-target report, error-analysis tables, held-out metrics, and public-safe package.

    current

    Foundation-Model Selection Matrix

    Keep Qwen3-Omni as the first trainable held-out pilot, use Cosmos 3 for world modeling and forward-dynamics trainer development, and stage policy candidates after robot-compatible action targets are explicit.

    Entry

    Completed 128-episode preparation or a smaller 3-8 episode preprocessing dry run.

    Evidence

    Foundation model plan, source links, model-specific entry conditions, and evaluation additions.

    partially implemented

    64-128 Episode Robustness Run

    Test whether pilot conclusions survive broader sessions, missing modalities, and stronger ablations.

    Entry

    Selected multi-episode pilot trains and evaluates cleanly.

    Evidence

    Metrics by session, task, modality, ablation, and failure type.

    planned

    Cosmos 3 and Policy-Model Extensions

    Extend toward future-window prediction, action-conditioned world modeling, synthetic-data tests, policy-style next action, and affordance reasoning.

    Entry

    Enough multi-episode data, compute budget, and model-specific action or world-state targets.

    Evidence

    Task-specific held-out evaluations, qualitative inspection, and updated model cards.

    future

    Xperience Embodied Foundation Model Pretraining

    Pretrain an Xperience-native domain model over synchronized video, audio, depth, pose, mocap, IMU, and language after smaller scaling stages prove value.

    Entry

    Full-corpus access, PB-scale storage path, multi-node compute, and positive scaling evidence.

    Evidence

    Pretraining manifests, scaling curves, held-out evaluations, checkpoint inventory, model card, and data-boundary report.

    Roadmap resources

    Roadmap details and source records.

    The roadmap links the concise stage view, the full track-and-task detail page, and structured data records used for the public release.

    detail page

    Focused roadmap detail page

    The detail page keeps the four research directions, linked task heads, stage gates, current evidence, and next steps in one sequence without nested controls.

    training plan

    Foundation model paths

    Spatial intelligence, human-video world modeling, and VLA training use different inputs and outputs while sharing the Xperience-10M sample structure.

    scale-up state

    Selected-128 and data-boundary evidence

    Use these notes to understand which selected-episode artifacts are public-safe, which raw files remain gated, and how the 128-episode comparison is staged.

    future model

    Xperience-native pretraining plan

    The long-range goal is an Xperience-native embodied foundation model after smaller selected-episode stages prove value and infrastructure is ready.

    Structured roadmap data

    These records keep roadmap stages, foundation-model plans, and selected-128 enhancement data aligned across the public release.

    Current experiments and next milestones.

    The project shows the completed public-sample task suite and the first verified multi-episode Qwen3-Omni diagnostic pilot, then lays out the next quality-improvement and model-extension steps.

    verified

    Sample windows and 20-task results

    5,821 frames become 1,161 synchronized 20-frame windows with an 8,546-dimensional representation, 20 task contracts, and the current 180-record public result matrix.

    verified

    Audio and modality evidence

    Audio variants improve the primary metric on 6 walkthrough-backed task contracts, while the feature manifest and raw browser keep each modality source inspectable.

    verified

    Research directions and foundation pipelines

    The Ropedia directions are labeled as direct, proxy, or diagnostic coverage and connected to spatial intelligence, human-video world-model, and vision-language-action training paths.

    current plan

    Foundation backbones are separated by role

    Current implemented/diagnostic tracks are Qwen3-Omni v6 and Cosmos3-Super/Nano. Candidate future policy tracks are OpenVLA/openpi/GR00T-style models after robot-compatible action conversion. Long-term, this points toward an Xperience-native embodied foundation model.

    verified diagnostic

    Qwen3-Omni and Cosmos3 model evidence

    The selected 96/16/16 split has a verified Qwen3-Omni v6 package with 4,032 held-out predictions and 99.90% JSON validity. Cosmos3-Nano, Cosmos3-Super Reasoner, and Cosmos3-Super Forward-Dynamics LoRA remain separate public-safe diagnostic branches.

    verified

    Visual system and figure index

    The logo, raw-sample stream thumbnails, task-suite figure, unified radar, model-architecture figures, and LoRA training-flow figure are indexed and reused across published mirrors.

    verified

    Governance and reproduction

    The project shares derived task artifacts, figures, reports, lightweight baselines, scripts, validators, and audit records. Raw videos, raw annotations, RRD visualizations, gated data, and full Qwen weights stay outside the repo.

    Research reading path.

    A newcomer should be able to move from the dataset sample to the task design, model baselines, current limitations, and scale-up plan without reading every file first.

    02

    Inspect one model input

    Use the window table and feature manifest to see the aligned sample unit, modality sources, and leakage controls.

    03

    Compare minimal vs neural heads

    Every task has a small interpretable baseline and a matching neural MLP head over the same feature contract and chronological split.

    04

    Check the scale-up gate

    The multi-episode Qwen3-Omni path now has a final verified diagnostic package and public LoRA adapter. The native-pretraining plan shows how this can grow into a full-corpus research direction after action/subtask improvements and stronger task metrics.

    05

    Push the current 128 episodes harder

    Use the no-new-episode enhancement pack before requesting more storage: it records dense-window estimates, `multiscale_20s10_40s20_80s40`, hierarchical labels, and raw-feature shard priorities.

    Verified nowOne public episode, 5,821 frames, 1,161 aligned windows, 8,546 dimensions, 20 unified task contracts, 20 Minimal and Neural MLP task-head rows, and 4 direction-extension probes.
    Next: no-new-episode scaleThe selected 128-episode suite should next use dense/multiscale windows, hierarchical labels, and raw-feature shards before adding more episodes.
    Next: error analysisThe selected 128-episode Qwen3-Omni LoRA result has a final verified diagnostic package; JSON validity meets target, and the next pass should improve action/subtask quality.
    Not redistributedRaw videos, raw annotations, full Qwen weights, and private gated Xperience-10M data are not included in the public repo or HF bundles.

    Glossary for project and field terms.

    This glossary covers the overloaded project terms plus adjacent technical terms from embodied AI, egocentric multimodal data, spatial geometry, world models, VLA/policy learning, training, evaluation, and public artifact reading.

    data Read multimodal sample terms

    Episode, window, modality, fisheye, depth, IMU, calibration, and synchronization terms are grouped with the project data boundary terms.

    space + time Decode geometry and world-model language

    Camera pose, SLAM, point clouds, rollouts, forward dynamics, long-horizon forecasting, and temporal leakage are defined next to the relevant tasks.

    robotics Connect VLA and policy terms

    Action chunks, policies, imitation learning, behavior cloning, end effectors, dexterity, contact, and language grounding are included for extension work.

    evidence Keep scores and published mirrors distinct

    Direct/proxy scores, raw metrics, radar values, held-out evaluation, Qwen/Cosmos branches, adapters, and HF mirrors remain explicitly separated.

    Loading glossary terms...

    Scrollable term index

    Search and filters update this box; scroll inside it to scan the full glossary without stretching the page.

    Term Meaning here Use it for Do not confuse with
    Egocentric videomultimodal sensingVideo captured from a first-person or body-mounted viewpoint.The sample streams are egocentric views of human interaction and are the visual basis for many tasks.Third-person robot-camera footage.
    Camera posespatial geometryThe camera position and orientation at a time step.Supports spatial-intelligence tasks, view synchronization, and geometry diagnostics.The human body pose.
    Forward dynamicstemporal and world modelsPredicting the next state from the current state and action/context.The Cosmos3-Super LoRA branch uses a forward-dynamics-style diagnostic contract.Reverse inference from result back to cause.
    Vision-language-action modelrobotics and VLAA model that maps visual context and language into actions.The VLA direction is a future path after action targets are converted into robot-compatible chunks.A vision-language model that only answers text.
    Direct scoretasks and metricsA metric computed against the task target directly.The preferred score type in the 20-task matrix.Compact-proxy score.
    Held-out evaluationtraining and evaluationTesting on examples not used for training.Required before promoting Qwen/Cosmos results to public evidence.Training-set loss.

    Choose the artifact by the question you have.

    For public links, score checks, reproducible runs, or the next model-training package, start with the route cards below. The full artifact library remains available after that first choice. Raw Xperience-10M data and Qwen weights are not redistributed.

    if you want public links Open the right published mirror

    Open GitHub, HF Space, artifact dataset, baseline models, or consolidated weights/results without guessing.

    Open published mirrors
    if you want to trust a score Check result parity

    Check source alignment, mirror parity, live URL hashes, and result audits before citing a number.

    Open checks
    if you want technical files Open GitHub and Hugging Face

    Scripts, manifests, task contracts, model cards, and derived artifacts stay in the source and mirror repositories.

    Open repositories
    if you want next models Continue model work

    Use Qwen3-Omni v6, Cosmos3-Super/Nano packages, the 128-episode feature index, and foundation-model plans for the next runs.

    Open scale-up
    Research artifacts

    From one episode to task heads

    Start with the files that define the sample windows, modality inputs, task contracts, metrics, walkthroughs, and research-direction mapping.

    Task results

    Every task definition, split detail, feature dimension, and minimal/neural metric in one project output.

    task results

    Windows table

    Window start/end frames and aligned action/subtask labels for the public sample episode.

    window table

    Feature inputs

    Source map for the current modality inputs used by the task suite.

    feature inputs

    Neural MLP task results

    Per-task PyTorch MLP metrics, predictions, histories, and checkpoints for the unified task contracts, with historical result-bundle paths retained for provenance.

    neural MLP outputs

    Four-direction taxonomy

    Maps the walkthrough-backed task contracts to the four research tracks: human modeling, 3D/4D reconstruction, egocentric interaction, and world modeling.

    research direction outputs

    Direction extension probes

    Four coded probes, one per research direction, with minimal and neural metrics plus prediction/rank CSVs.

    extension probe outputs

    Task walkthroughs

    Case studies for the walkthrough-backed task contracts, including input, middle process modules, output, metric, limitation, and task-player data.

    walkthrough outputs

    Audio ablation and raw upgrade

    All 72 task/variant rows comparing current audio, no audio, raw audio, replacement, and combined-input settings.

    audio ablation outputs

    Single-episode explorer

    Interactive window-level view of labels, predictions, modality statistics, object labels, and diagnostics.

    open explorer

    Cross-modal retrieval

    The strongest self-supervised signal from the single episode.

    retrieval metrics

    Qwen3-Omni diagnostic run is verified.

    The selected pilot uses 128 source-balanced episodes across 128 different session UUIDs. The latest v6 held-out package is verified, and its weak metrics define the next structured-output and error-analysis pass.

    Selection

    128 complete episodes selected from 128 unique top-level sessions, balanced across episode-size bands and split 96/16/16 for train/val/test.

    source/feature index

    Transfer

    Download raw episodes only from official gated sources, exclude visualization.rrd, validate files, then stage them for training.

    Current LoRA artifact

    The current Qwen3-Omni LoRA artifact is the verified v6 selected 128-episode diagnostic adapter. The v5 row remains pinned as the prior release, and the 1-episode Qwen entry is only a sensor-adapter smoke test.

    model groups

    No-new-episode suite push

    The next suite push does not need more episodes first: use `multiscale_20s10_40s20_80s40`, hierarchical action/subtask targets, and raw-feature shards while keeping the held-out split fixed.

    enhancement data

    Backbone tracks

    Qwen3-Omni uses a separate LoRA model repo; Cosmos3-Nano remains a compatibility package; Cosmos3-Super now has a verified forward-dynamics LoRA artifact with weights in a dedicated model repo.

    Cosmos3-Super weights

    Native foundation model

    The long-term goal is a full-corpus Xperience Embodied Foundation Model trained on synchronized perception, geometry, motion, inertial, audio, and language streams after smaller scaling stages validate the approach.

    pretraining plan

    Foundation-model scale-up paths.

    These three paths translate Xperience-10M files into larger spatial, world-model, and vision-language-action training directions after the current task suite and selected-128 diagnostic results.

    High-resolution slide diagram showing the Spatial intelligence models direction for Xperience-10M.
    High-resolution direction slide

    Spatial intelligence models

    Train spatial-memory models from multiview RGB, egocentric video, depth, pose, calibration, object/contact cues, and language prompts; evaluate spatial QA, object permanence, counting, retrieval, and pose-aware consistency.

    Sample input

    Use windows.csv and shared_windows.npz to slice each 20-frame window, then join six MP4 RGB streams with annotation.hdf5 depth, camera pose, SLAM/calibration, object cues, contacts, and optional language questions.

    Training output

    Build targets such as camera-view match, object relevance, object-set memory, depth/pose reconstruction proxy, caption-grounded retrieval, and spatial QA answers derived from the same public annotation timeline.

    High-resolution slide diagram showing the Human-video world models direction for Xperience-10M.
    High-resolution direction slide

    Human-video world models

    Train future-prediction models from observed interaction windows to score next action, next subtask, future object set, contact transition, camera-motion delta, and latent future state, with Qwen-style probes and Cosmos-style dynamics kept separate.

    Sample input

    Take the current 20-frame observed window at time t from shared_windows.npz: RGB/audio/sensor summaries, hand/body motion, camera pose, current object/contact state, and current action/subtask context only.

    Training output

    Shift the same episode timeline forward to produce next-action, next-subtask, future object-set, contact-transition, time-to-transition, camera-motion delta, or latent/future-feature targets. Future labels stay out of the input.

    High-resolution slide diagram showing the Vision-language-action models direction for Xperience-10M.
    High-resolution direction slide

    Vision-language-action models

    Train VLA or policy-compatible heads only after converting egocentric video, captions, hand/body motion, contacts, objects, and procedures into traceable action tokens, chunks, and object-conditioned action targets.

    Sample input

    Use egocentric/fisheye video windows, caption/object context from annotation.hdf5, hand/body mocap, contact state, and current subtask text as the observation-language side of each training pair.

    Training output

    For the one-sample suite, output action-token proxies: current/next action, object-conditioned action relation, contact state, interaction-text class, subtask transition, or hand-trajectory/action-chunk proxy. Robot action chunks need a later retargeting converter.

    Episode taxonomy and data engine

    Build an episode atlas, category tags, balance report, and split builder across activities, objects, scenes, sessions, people, and missing modalities.

    Open development plan

    Standardized benchmark protocol

    Version train/val/test manifests, task cards, leakage checks, metric scripts, and reference baselines so future model scores are comparable.

    Open benchmark protocol note

    Multimodal representation learning

    Train contrastive and masked-prediction encoders over synchronized video, audio, depth, pose, mocap, IMU, and language windows.

    Open representation-learning plan

    Skill and procedure graphs

    Mine action steps, transitions, preconditions, effects, and temporal graphs that connect egocentric perception to planning.

    current task map

    Human-object affordances

    Add contact, reachable-object, tool-use, and next-affordance tasks using hands, mocap, objects, contacts, video, and language.

    task walkthroughs

    3D/4D scene and object memory

    Fuse depth, pose/SLAM, multiview video, and object cues into persistent scene/object maps for spatial reasoning and object permanence.

    model tracks

    Quality and sync diagnostics

    Track timestamp drift, missing streams, calibration consistency, corrupted files, and degraded-mode manifests before large training runs.

    evidence contract

    Policy and simulation transfer

    Convert mocap, hand trajectories, contacts, and object states into action tokens, robot-compatible targets, and imitation-learning examples.

    foundation plan